The U.S. Senate has confirmed Linda McMahon as the new Secretary of Education. McMahon is a former wrestling executive and close ally of former President Donald Trump. She was confirmed by a 51-45 vote, and her appointment signals that big changes could be coming to the Education Department.

Who is Linda McMahon?

McMahon is a billionaire businesswoman with limited experience in education. She previously ran the Small Business Administration (SBA) under Trump’s first term. McMahon also leads the America First Policy Institute, a conservative think tank. Many senior officials in the Education Department are expected to support her approach, which could lead to major changes in how the department operates.

During her confirmation hearing, McMahon expressed full support for Trump’s plan to reduce the role of the federal government in education. She said she wanted to return control of education to state governments. McMahon acknowledged that only Congress could fully eliminate the Education Department, but she is likely to push for significant downsizing.

A Shift in the Education Department

Under McMahon’s leadership, the Education Department may undergo major changes. Trump has promised to shrink or even dismantle the department. Some reports suggest he might issue an executive order instructing McMahon to reduce the department’s scope to the legal minimum. If that happens, McMahon will have to work with Congress to make sure it aligns with the law.

The department currently manages billions of dollars in funding for K-12 schools and oversees the $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio. Federal money accounts for about 14% of public school budgets. McMahon has promised to protect key programs like Pell Grants and Title I funding. These programs help low-income students and schools, but her leadership could still change how the department operates.

A Focus on Local Control

One of McMahon’s key goals is to give more power to state governments. She believes that education should be managed at the local level, not by the federal government. McMahon’s views align with Trump’s belief that the federal government should have a smaller role in many areas of American life, including education.

McMahon’s approach will likely focus on reducing the Education Department’s influence over schools. While some people support this idea, others are worried that it could harm students. Critics argue that federal programs help ensure fairness and access to quality education. They fear that a smaller federal role could lead to more inequality in education.

DEI Programs Under Fire

One of the most controversial changes McMahon will face is related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Schools and universities have until February 28 to eliminate these programs or risk losing federal funding. This is part of a broader effort by the Education Department to limit such initiatives.

The Education Department has already issued guidance against DEI programs. A new reporting portal will track how schools use DEI initiatives. Critics argue that these programs are necessary to promote fairness and equality in schools. However, McMahon and other conservatives believe DEI programs divide people and should be removed.

McMahon’s leadership will likely focus on scaling back these programs and reducing their influence. This could have a major impact on students and faculty who support diversity and inclusion efforts.

What’s Next for the Education Department?

McMahon will lead an Education Department that has played a large role in shaping American education for over 40 years. The department was created in 1979 under President Jimmy Carter. Since then, it has managed billions in funding for schools, provided financial aid to students, and set educational standards.

While McMahon has promised to protect certain programs, many people are concerned about the future of federal education funding. Will the government continue to support schools and students in the same way? Or will McMahon’s policies lead to cuts in federal education programs?

McMahon’s appointment could signal a shift away from the expansion of federal education programs. Critics worry that reducing the federal government’s role could hurt low-income students and underfunded schools. Supporters believe that giving states more control will lead to better results and less bureaucracy.

The Impact on Education

The future of education in America could change dramatically under McMahon’s leadership. Her focus on reducing the federal role in education may lead to fewer resources for schools that rely on federal funding. This could affect both K-12 education and higher education.

While McMahon has vowed to keep key programs like Pell Grants and Title I funding, the broader trend seems to be a move away from federal involvement. This shift will likely change how schools operate and how they are funded. McMahon’s leadership will be key to determining whether these changes benefit or hurt American students.

Many are watching closely to see what McMahon’s next steps will be. Will she follow Trump’s vision for a smaller government? Or will she find a middle ground that keeps important programs intact?

For now, all eyes are on McMahon and the Education Department. As she takes on this new role, her decisions will shape the future of American education for years to come.

For more updates on education policy and other political developments, visit Wallstreet Storys.