The U.S. Supreme Court has denied the Trump administration’s appeal to overturn a judge’s order requiring the release of nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. In a 5-4 decision on Wednesday, the Court upheld U.S. District Judge Amir Ali’s ruling, which mandated that funds be allocated for completed projects. Despite the ruling, nonprofit organizations and businesses that sued for the funds are still waiting for payment, with some facing layoffs due to the delay.

Court’s Decision and Implications
In a significant decision, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the Trump administration’s request to challenge a lower court’s ruling on the release of $2 billion in foreign aid. Judge Ali’s order had required the funds to be distributed for projects that had already been completed, setting a deadline for their release. The administration’s appeal was rejected, leaving the original ruling in place.

This decision marks a notable setback for the Trump administration, which had sought to delay the distribution of the funds. The ruling now forces the government to comply with the release of the funds, which had been frozen as part of Trump-era policies.

Nonprofits and Businesses Still Await Payments
Although the ruling has been made, many nonprofits and businesses that filed lawsuits to recover the funds are still awaiting payment. These organizations argue that they are owed money for projects that have already been completed, yet the delay in releasing the funds continues to have a significant impact.

In one particularly troubling case, a nonprofit organization was forced to lay off 110 employees last week due to the financial delay caused by the withholding of the foreign aid. The ongoing uncertainty has left many groups in a difficult position, unable to move forward with critical work.

Second Failed Appeal for Trump Administration
This marks the second time the Trump administration has failed to convince the Supreme Court to limit lower-court rulings related to Trump-era policies. The first setback occurred when the administration sought to challenge a similar ruling earlier, and the second rejection signals the Court’s unwillingness to support the government’s stance on these specific foreign aid matters.

The rejection is a clear indication that the Supreme Court is upholding judicial rulings from lower courts in cases related to government accountability and foreign aid distribution. Despite the administration’s appeal, the Justices have sided with the lower court’s interpretation of the law.

Conservative Justices Express Discontent
The ruling was not without dissent, as Justice Samuel Alito, along with three other conservative justices, criticized the decision. Alito argued that Judge Ali had exceeded his authority by ordering the immediate release of the funds, calling the ruling an “act of judicial overreach.” He contended that the decision unfairly burdened taxpayers by requiring them to cover the $2 billion expense.

In the dissenting opinion, Alito and his colleagues emphasized the potential consequences of the decision, including what they viewed as judicial overstep in managing the executive branch’s authority over foreign aid funds.

Majority and Next Steps
The Supreme Court’s majority opinion, led by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, sided with the lower court’s decision to release the funds. They noted that while the administration had not contested the original ruling, it had only raised concerns about the timing of the deadline, which had already passed.

The Court’s decision allows Judge Ali’s restraining order to stand, which blocked the funding freeze and instructed the administration to begin releasing the funds. Additionally, the Court asked Ali to clarify the government’s obligations under the restraining order while considering feasible compliance timelines.

A follow-up hearing is scheduled for Thursday, where Judge Ali will address the long-term solution for the foreign aid payments.

Ongoing Financial Strain
While the Supreme Court’s decision brings some clarity regarding the immediate release of foreign aid funds, many organizations remain uncertain about the timeline for full payment. The delay has already caused significant strain on businesses and nonprofits that depend on the funds, with layoffs and financial hardship affecting employees and communities.

The Court’s ruling sets the stage for a continued legal and financial battle, as the administration works to address the funding distribution and the associated obligations. For now, nonprofit organizations and businesses are left hoping that the government will soon comply with the legal requirements set by the Court.

For updates on government policies and Supreme Court decisions, visit Wallstreet Storys.