Negotiations between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. Vice President JD Vance in Munich ended without a final deal on critical minerals. The discussions, which are key to securing support from former U.S. President Donald Trump, remain ongoing. The outcome of these talks could impact both military aid and economic ties between the two countries.

Zelenskyy and his team had hoped for a quick agreement. However, disagreements over security guarantees and economic terms have delayed progress. While both sides called the talks productive, major issues remain unresolved.

Disagreements Over Terms and Security

Ukraine had presented a revised proposal that would give U.S. investors access to its rich mineral deposits. These include rare earth elements, titanium, uranium, and lithium. These resources are critical for industries such as defense, electronics, and renewable energy.

The U.S. responded with a counterproposal last Wednesday. However, Ukraine raised concerns about the deal. The main issue was the lack of clear security guarantees from the U.S. and Europe. Kyiv wants strong protections against future Russian aggression, especially as Ukraine continues its fight against Russian forces.

Zelenskyy stated that Ukraine is open to working with the U.S. but wants a fair deal. He emphasized that Ukraine seeks a long-term partnership instead of just giving away its resources. However, his delegation admitted that key details still need to be addressed.

One Ukrainian official noted that Washington’s proposal leaned heavily in favor of U.S. interests. This has caused hesitation in Kyiv, which wants terms that also benefit Ukraine’s economy and security.

Economic and Political Stakes

The Trump administration has tied continued military aid for Ukraine to a deal worth $500 billion in critical minerals. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered the U.S. proposal, stressing that Washington wants to integrate Ukraine’s economy more closely with the U.S.

Bessent pointed to past American privatization efforts as a model for Ukraine. He argued that closer economic ties with the U.S. would strengthen Ukraine’s financial position. However, some Ukrainian officials fear that too much foreign control over their resources could hurt Ukraine’s independence.

During a private meeting with U.S. senators in Munich, Zelenskyy expressed frustration. He felt pressured to sign an agreement he had not fully reviewed. Sources inside the talks described the U.S. proposal as heavily one-sided.

Democratic Senator Brian Schatz confirmed that Ukraine has asked for major revisions. He acknowledged that the current proposal does not yet meet Ukraine’s needs. Other senators also raised concerns about fairness and transparency in the deal.

U.S. Pressures Ukraine for a Deal

The U.S. is eager to finalize the agreement as soon as possible. The Trump administration sees Ukraine’s critical minerals as essential for reducing U.S. reliance on China. Washington also believes a deal will give Ukraine long-term economic support.

However, Ukraine is taking a cautious approach. The country has learned from past deals that favor foreign investors while offering little in return. Kyiv is determined to secure terms that protect both its economic and national security interests.

Zelenskyy stressed that any agreement must be fair to both sides. He made it clear that Ukraine will not rush into a deal without carefully reviewing all conditions.

Next Steps in the Negotiations

Both Ukraine and the U.S. have agreed to continue discussions in the coming weeks. Ukrainian officials say they are willing to work toward a final deal but want better security commitments from Washington.

Meanwhile, European leaders are also paying close attention. Many worry that Ukraine could be forced into a deal that does not align with European interests. Some EU officials have suggested offering Ukraine alternative economic support if the U.S. deal fails.

The outcome of these talks will have lasting effects on U.S.-Ukraine relations. If an agreement is reached, it could lead to increased military aid and investment in Ukraine’s economy. However, if no deal is made, Ukraine may face financial uncertainty at a crucial time in its war with Russia.

As negotiations continue, Ukraine remains firm in seeking fair terms. The U.S., on the other hand, is pushing for a quick resolution. Whether the two sides can find common ground remains to be seen.

For more updates on this developing story, visit Wall Street Storys.