Romania’s constitutional court has annulled the first round of the presidential election, citing evidence of foreign meddling. The decision, based on declassified intelligence, requires a complete re-run of the election and has sparked widespread debate about democracy and external influence in the EU member state.
Russian Interference Allegations
President Klaus Iohannis recently revealed intelligence accusing Russia of orchestrating a coordinated social media campaign to influence the election. The report alleged that thousands of accounts on platforms like TikTok and Telegram promoted far-right candidate Călin Georgescu. Algorithms and paid promotions amplified his visibility, despite his status as an outsider with no declared campaign spending.
Georgescu’s surprising victory in the November 24 first round shocked observers. His rise contradicted earlier polls, which placed him in the single digits. Advocating for policies like ending Romanian support for Ukraine, Georgescu’s platform aligned with Russian interests, raising concerns about his potential presidency.
TikTok denied giving Georgescu special treatment, and Moscow dismissed allegations of interference. However, Romanian authorities labeled the election interference part of “aggressive hybrid Russian attacks,” prompting the court to nullify the results and cancel the December 10 runoff.
Public and Political Reactions
The court’s decision divided opinion. Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu praised the annulment, calling it the only viable response to “blatantly distorted” election results caused by foreign interference. He emphasized the need to safeguard democratic processes.
Elena Lasconi, Georgescu’s opponent and a pro-European candidate, condemned the ruling as “illegal and amoral.” She argued it undermined voter rights and the essence of democracy.
The annulment triggered protests in Bucharest, where thousands gathered to voice support for democracy. Activists, artists, and civic leaders chanted slogans like “Europe!” and “No Fascism,” while holding banners that read “Democracy is in danger” and “Our children will be free.”
Far-Right Surge and Broader Implications
Georgescu’s rise reflects growing support for far-right movements in Romania. Far-right parties performed well in recent parliamentary elections, although the ruling pro-European Social Democrats remained the largest faction and are expected to form a coalition government.
A Georgescu presidency could have shifted Romania’s geopolitical alignment, pulling it away from its pro-Western stance. Analysts feared Romania might join countries like Hungary and Slovakia, where far-right, Russia-friendly politicians wield significant influence.
An AtlasIntel poll conducted after the interference revelations showed a tight race, with Lasconi leading Georgescu 48.6% to 46.4%. The numbers highlighted political divisions driven by voter frustration over inflation and concerns about the Ukraine war.
Next Steps for Romania
Although largely ceremonial, the Romanian presidency wields moral authority and plays a crucial role in shaping foreign policy. The president also appoints the prime minister, a key position as the country grapples with its fragmented parliament.
Meanwhile, prosecutors have opened a money-laundering investigation against Georgescu, further complicating his political future.
As Romania prepares for a full election re-run, the country faces the dual challenge of rebuilding trust in its democratic processes and countering external interference. Its actions will determine its future within the EU and NATO while signaling its resilience against foreign influence.
