In a move that has sent shockwaves through the academic community, the Trump administration has officially stripped Harvard University of its authorization to enroll new international students. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Thursday that it has revoked Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). This decision effectively blocks the university from admitting any new foreign students. Current international students are now faced with the difficult choice of transferring to another school or risking the loss of their legal residency status in the United States.
Homeland Security Cites Campus Unrest, Antisemitism, and China Ties
The DHS, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, made the announcement amidst claims that Harvard has failed to adequately address violent incidents and antisemitic behavior on its campus. Secretary Noem accused Harvard of maintaining questionable ties with the Chinese Communist Party, which the administration sees as a serious security threat.
“Accepting foreign students is not a right—it’s a privilege,” Noem said during the announcement. “No institution should benefit from international tuition while turning a blind eye to threats against our values and security.” Her statement framed the decision as a matter of national security and moral responsibility.
Harvard University quickly rejected these allegations. The university called the DHS decision “illegitimate” and confirmed it will take legal action to challenge the move. Harvard’s legal team plans to argue that the revocation is politically motivated and lacks proper basis in law or fact.
A New Front in Political Conflict Between Academia and the White House
This latest action represents a sharp escalation in the ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and elite academic institutions. Harvard, along with other top universities, has frequently opposed federal policies on admissions standards, diversity rules, and campus governance.
Over the past year, the administration has frozen or reduced significant federal funding to Harvard. In response to tightening budgets and growing pressure, Harvard’s President Alan Garber recently announced a voluntary pay cut, signaling the financial strain the university now faces.
Observers see the current move to revoke SEVP certification as part of a broader political campaign targeting institutions perceived as opposing the administration’s agenda.
Thousands of Students Now in Limbo
The decision puts thousands of Harvard’s international students in a precarious position. According to reports from the New York Times, Harvard is home to about 6,800 international students. This group makes up roughly 27% of the university’s total student body—a significant increase from less than 20% in 2010.
It is unclear how many of these affected students come from Europe or other regions beyond China. However, the impact on students and their families is expected to be profound.
International students are a vital part of the U.S. university system, both academically and financially. Many pay higher tuition fees than domestic students, contributing a major revenue stream to their institutions. The loss of SEVP certification threatens not only Harvard’s academic programs but also its financial health.
Background: DHS Investigations and Compliance Issues
The revocation follows a prolonged investigation by the Department of Homeland Security. In April, DHS demanded that Harvard provide internal records related to alleged unlawful activity involving student visa holders. The university missed the deadline to comply fully with the request, prompting the department to act on its threat.
This investigation and subsequent action have sent a chilling message across U.S. higher education, signaling a tougher stance on international students and university compliance.
Broader Implications for U.S. Higher Education
Harvard’s case highlights increasing tensions over the role of international students in American universities. The Trump administration has pursued stricter immigration policies and heightened scrutiny of foreign nationals in recent years, citing national security concerns.
Critics argue that these policies undermine U.S. universities’ competitiveness and harm the country’s global leadership in education and research. International students often contribute significantly to campus diversity, innovation, and funding.
Universities across the country are closely watching the Harvard case. Many fear that similar actions could affect their ability to attract and retain top global talent.
Harvard’s Response and Next Steps
Harvard has vowed to fight the decision vigorously. University officials emphasize their commitment to fostering a safe, inclusive environment while upholding academic freedom.
“We strongly reject the unfounded claims made by DHS,” Harvard spokesperson said. “We are confident that our record and actions show our commitment to campus safety and international collaboration.”
Harvard’s legal challenge will likely play out in court over the coming months, with potentially wide-reaching effects on U.S. immigration policy for students.
What This Means for International Students
For the tens of thousands of international students at Harvard and other U.S. schools, this ruling creates uncertainty. Those currently enrolled at Harvard must now consider transferring to maintain their visa status.
The decision also raises questions about the future attractiveness of American universities for foreign students, especially amid political tensions and stricter immigration controls.
The Trump administration’s move to revoke Harvard University’s authorization to admit international students marks a significant turning point in U.S. higher education and immigration policy. It underscores growing conflicts between the government and academic institutions, with deep implications for students, universities, and America’s role in global education.
Author
-
Jerry Jackson is an experienced news reporter and editor at New York Mirror, specializing in a wide range of topics, from current events to in-depth analysis. Known for his thorough research and clear reporting, Jerry ensures that the content is both accurate and engaging for readers.
View all posts