JP Morgan, one of the largest banks in the world, is facing criticism for investing millions in Glencore, a mining company accused of harming the environment. The bank has promoted funds labeled as “sustainable,” yet these funds have invested over £200 million in Glencore. Campaigners are now questioning the bank’s commitment to ethical investing, especially after reports revealed serious environmental violations by Glencore in South Africa.

Sustainable Investment or Greenwashing?

The sustainable investment market is booming, with predictions that it will exceed $40 trillion by 2030. Banks and financial institutions are eager to enter this market, offering funds that promise to invest in environmentally friendly businesses. However, the industry is under scrutiny as investors and activists demand more transparency.

A joint investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Voxeurop, and the Daily Maverick found that several of JP Morgan’s sustainable funds hold investments in Glencore, a London-listed company known for its coal mining business. This has raised doubts about how sustainable these funds truly are. Critics argue that banks are using misleading labels to attract investors while continuing to fund industries that harm the planet.

Glencore’s Environmental Violations in South Africa

Glencore has been accused of multiple environmental violations in Mpumalanga, a province rich in coal deposits. The town of Phola, located 70 miles east of Johannesburg, is surrounded by Glencore’s mining operations. According to a South African government report obtained through a freedom of information request, Glencore’s Tweefontein mine has been breaking environmental laws since 2017.

The report highlights several violations, including:

• Contaminating a local river with waste materials.
• Storing hazardous waste improperly.
• Failing to repair critical sewage infrastructure.

Residents of Phola say they do not trust their water supply. Many report stomach issues after drinking it. Activists argue that mining companies like Glencore profit from the region’s resources while offering little in return. Unemployment remains high, and local infrastructure continues to decline.

Despite these concerns, Glencore insists that it follows environmental laws. The company says it provides clean water through a treatment facility and monitors water quality regularly. However, a government inspection report from November 2023 found that Glencore’s Tweefontein mine was still breaking multiple environmental laws.

JP Morgan’s Sustainable Investment Criteria Under Fire

JP Morgan’s asset management division runs more than 500 funds marketed as sustainable. Under current guidelines, at least 51% of these investments must support positive environmental or social initiatives. However, up to 49% can be invested in other sectors, which allows funds to include companies like Glencore.

Climate think tank Theia Finance Labs warns that many investors might feel misled by these classifications. Jakob Thomä, the group’s CEO, says some funds may even be violating EU consumer protection laws, which prohibit misleading marketing practices.

JP Morgan claims that its funds exclude companies earning more than 20% of their revenue from thermal coal extraction. While Glencore’s revenue from coal remains under this limit, coal mining still accounts for nearly half of its total profit. Critics say this raises questions about how JP Morgan defines sustainability.

Demands for Greater Accountability

Activists are now calling for stricter rules on sustainable investing. Mariette Liefferink, CEO of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment, wrote to JP Morgan’s head of sustainable investing, Chuka Umunna, urging the bank to rethink its support for Glencore. She pointed to environmental damage, pollution, and violations of South African laws. Umunna, a former UK MP, did not respond. However, his role does not include making decisions about JP Morgan’s asset management policies.

Liefferink specifically mentioned two JP Morgan funds that use ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) branding, which have millions invested in Glencore. Critics argue that unless stricter criteria are introduced, sustainable investment funds will continue to include companies that harm the environment.

Regulators are now discussing ways to improve ESG classification standards. The goal is to prevent misleading labels and ensure that funds truly align with environmental and social responsibility. As the demand for sustainable investments grows, transparency will be key in maintaining public trust.

The Broader Problem of Greenwashing

This controversy is not unique to JP Morgan. Many financial institutions have been accused of “greenwashing”—giving the false impression that they are environmentally responsible. In recent years, several banks and investment firms have faced investigations over misleading sustainability claims.

For example, in 2022, German authorities raided the offices of DWS, the asset management arm of Deutsche Bank, over allegations of greenwashing. The firm had claimed that a large portion of its assets were sustainable, but regulators found evidence suggesting otherwise. This case highlights the need for stronger oversight in the financial industry.

What Happens Next?

The pressure is mounting on JP Morgan to explain its investment choices. Investors and activists want clearer guidelines to ensure that sustainable funds live up to their promises. As regulatory bodies review ESG classification rules, financial institutions will likely face more scrutiny in the coming years.

For now, JP Morgan has declined to comment on the controversy. Glencore, meanwhile, continues to defend its environmental record, despite evidence of ongoing violations.

As debates over ethical investing continue, one thing is clear: the financial industry must do more to ensure that sustainability claims are backed by real actions, not just marketing.

For more updates on financial controversies and sustainability issues, visit Wallstreet Storys.