The Trump administration has begun a major reduction in the federal workforce, eliminating more than 11,000 jobs across two key agencies: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Defense (Pentagon). These cuts are part of a broader strategy to reduce the size and cost of the federal government.
IRS Cuts 6,000 Jobs During Tax Season
On Thursday, the IRS started laying off approximately 6,000 employees during the critical tax season, a time when millions of Americans are filing their annual tax returns. The timing of these layoffs has raised concerns, especially as tax season is one of the busiest periods for the agency.
The IRS, which employed around 83,000 people as of the 2023 fiscal year, has targeted probationary employees for most of the cuts. These are workers who have been with the agency for less than a year and are often the first to be laid off during cost-cutting measures. Many of the workers losing their jobs are in positions related to tax compliance and customer service, making their departure especially significant during a time when Americans rely heavily on the agency for assistance with tax filings.
Reports indicate that the Small Business/Self-Employed (SBSE) Division of the IRS will be hit hardest, with over 3,500 probationary employees set to lose their jobs by the end of the week. These employees typically help ensure that businesses and self-employed individuals comply with tax laws and make accurate payments.
Harvard Kennedy School professor Linda Bilmes has raised concerns about the impact of these layoffs on taxpayers, particularly those who rely on IRS workers for help during tax season. She warned that the cuts could lead to longer wait times for assistance and greater frustration for taxpayers trying to navigate the complex tax system.
Pentagon Cuts 5,000 Jobs, Implementing Hiring Freeze
The Department of Defense (DoD) has also announced significant job cuts, with plans to lay off over 5,000 civilian employees. This move is part of an effort to reduce the Pentagon’s workforce by 5 to 8%, a strategy aimed at increasing efficiency and realigning the department with President Trump’s priorities. In addition to the layoffs, the Pentagon will implement a hiring freeze, limiting future staffing levels across the department.
The Pentagon is the largest federal agency, employing approximately 950,000 civilians. While the initial cuts will affect 5,400 probationary workers, further reductions may be announced in the coming months. The Pentagon has defended the decision, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stating that the agency needs to “cut the fat” from its headquarters while focusing on growing the “muscle” of warfighters. His statement suggests that the cuts are aimed at streamlining administrative positions, rather than frontline military personnel.
The Pentagon has long been criticized for its bloated bureaucracy, and the current administration has made efforts to address inefficiencies within the department. However, the proposed layoffs could have significant implications for the workers affected, many of whom perform crucial administrative and logistical roles supporting military operations.
Trump’s Cost-Cutting Initiative and Elon Musk’s Role
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) has been tasked with executing these job reductions. The department, a new initiative under the Trump administration, is focused on streamlining government operations and cutting unnecessary expenses. According to an email obtained by CBS News, the IRS layoffs have been focused on employees on probationary status, who were considered non-essential for tax season.
Musk’s involvement in the initiative has raised some eyebrows, given his controversial reputation as a business mogul and his recent involvement in government-related projects. Musk has long been an advocate for reducing government spending and increasing efficiency, and his role in this initiative aligns with his broader vision of a more streamlined and cost-effective federal government.
Public and Political Reactions to the Layoffs
The layoffs at the IRS and Pentagon have sparked mixed reactions from the public and political leaders. On one hand, proponents of the cuts argue that the federal government has grown too large and inefficient, and that reducing the size of the workforce is necessary to improve performance and reduce taxpayer burden. On the other hand, critics of the cuts warn that they could lead to significant disruptions in government services, particularly for those who rely on the IRS for tax assistance or the Pentagon for defense-related administrative support.
A recent Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that 54% of Americans disapprove of President Trump’s handling of the federal government, while 44% approve. As the layoffs continue, public debate is expected to intensify, with many questioning the long-term effects of reducing the size of the federal workforce.
The Future of the Federal Workforce
The Trump administration’s push to reduce the federal workforce has been a point of contention since the president took office. While Republicans have long advocated for budget cuts and smaller government, the scale of these layoffs—especially during tax season—has raised concerns about the impact on public services. The IRS cuts, in particular, come at a time when the agency is already under pressure to manage an increasing workload due to new tax laws and enforcement priorities.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking on Fox News, stated that Trump’s ultimate goal is to eliminate the IRS entirely and replace it with an “External Revenue Service.” This new agency would raise funds through tariffs on foreign imports rather than relying on domestic tax collection. The proposal has been met with skepticism from some quarters, particularly from those who argue that such a drastic change could create even more inefficiencies and complications within the tax system.
As the administration moves forward with its plan to reduce the federal workforce, the future of the IRS, Pentagon, and other government agencies remains uncertain. While the goal of reducing government spending and increasing efficiency may resonate with some, the consequences of these layoffs could have far-reaching effects on the services that millions of Americans rely on.
For more updates on government policies and workforce changes, visit Wallstreet Storys.
